Monday, September 29, 2008

"Immigration" in Rochester

I go to St. Francis of Assisi Church here in town. Over the past few years, the politics preached from the pulpit has become decidedly more obvious and certainly more leftist.

The bulletin from Sept.21st is a good example. It details the May 12 raid by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) staff Agriprocessors Inc., the nation's largest kosher slaughterhouse.

According to the Des Moines Register article,

"Months in planning, Monday's raid involved 16 local, state and federal agencies, led by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). They executed search warrants related to criminal activity, as well as a civil search warrant for people believed to be in the United States illegally.

A federal search warrant said immigration officials have filed almost 700 complaints about immigration violations and criminal activity by workers at the Postville plant. The activity spans a two-year period, and some workers face multiple allegations.Federal officials allege that as many as three-fourths of the company's workers at the end of last year were using
fraudulent Social Security numbers.

Last November, the search warrant said, ICE agents interviewed a former
Agriprocessors supervisor who said
some employees were running a methamphetamine lab in the plant and were bringing weapons to work. Another source alleged worker abuse, officials said in the warrant. In one case, a supervisor covered the eyes of an employee with duct tape and struck him with a meat hook. The worker, who had entered the country illegally from Guatemala, was not seriously injured. He declined to report the incident for fear of losing his
job, the warrant said. Another plant worker told federal officials that undocumented workers were paid $5 an hour for their first few months before receiving a pay increase to $6 per hour. The minimum wage in Iowa is $7.25 an hour."


The church bulletin mentions none of the allegations, but offers these conclusions:

"As a society, we cannot condone detaining thousands of immigrants every year"
Illegal aliens, not merely immigrants.

"who pose no threat to public safety or flight risk"
No threat to safety? Sez who?
How about the young woman, Olga Marina Franco, an illegal alien from Guatemala (the same place as those detained in Postville) who ran a stop sign, hitting a school bus and causing a crash that killed four children, near the southwestern Minnesota town of Cottonwood MN. She was later convicted of four counts of criminal vehicular homicide. She was driving without a license.

Here's a list of "unthreatening" illegal alien drivers without licenses, and their victims.
A report by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Study found 20 percent of fatal accidents involve at least one driver who lacks a valid license. In California, another study showed that those who have never held a valid license are about five times more likely to be involved in a fatal road accident than licensed drivers.

"First, the nation needs a rational immigration policy that creates a path to citizenship, reunifies families and protects workers' rights."
We already have a rational immigraion policy that creates a path to citizenship. These people decided they don't like it. Reunifies families? Easily accomplished by moving back to Guatemala, no?

"Fourth, employers must be required to comply with the nation's labor laws."
By not hiring illegal aliens. Because it is illegal.

"The US Catholic Bishops have offered five principles that might guide us through to justice-based legislation: 1. Persons have the right to find opportunities in their homeland."
Good point. Why exactly do the economies do badly? Could it be the absence of (horrors) capitalism and the rule of law?

"Persons have the right to migrate to support themselves and their families."
They do? Where does this right come from? When was it granted? Is it a natural right? Why has it never existed before?

"Sovereign nations have the right to control their borders."
Except when it comes to the USA, however.

"Refugees and asylum seekers should be afforded protection."
At what cost? And are all illegal aliens now 'refugees', or does this issue have anything at all to do with illegal immigrants?

"The human dignity and human rights of undocumented migrants should be respected."
Meaning what exactly? How do you maintain the dignity of people who are repeatedly and brazenly violating the law? Do we not arrest them or detain them?


Please inform me, have the US Catholic Bishops always been leftists?

Monday, September 22, 2008

Oh, just go easy on them, Judge!

Okay, here's one more reason why we have a serious crime problem in Rochester.
Commit a crime here, and the judge might just give you a stern talking to.

Four charged in connection with beating, theft in Rochester parking lot

Robbery, riot and assault charges have been filed against four men accused of beating up a man in the Perkins restaurant parking lot (16th Ave. N.W.) 9:30 p.m. Monday night, and stealing things from his car.

Five to seven males surrounded another man; three punched and kicked him while others watched.

Suspects' records
  • Demaine Jendale Cortez Barker, 20, 425 11th Ave. N.E.
"Barker was charged in May with a felony, accused of selling drugs. He has pleaded not guilty to those charges, and a trial is set for January. In 2007, he was charged with leading police on a chase and jumping from his running car, which crashed into a house. In December, he pleaded guilty to felony fleeing a peace officer and misdemeanor fourth-degree damage to property. He was sentenced in May and put on probation for three years, to run concurrently with sentences on a fifth-degree felony drug charge and a felony charge of failing to appear at a court hearing. He was back in court Sept. 11 and resentenced after admitting violating terms of probation.

"The judge continued the three-year probation.

"In 2004, he was sentenced in juvenile court for assaulting another teen with a wooden table leg during a shop class at John Marshall High School. The victim suffered a fractured skull and needed several surgeries. Barker was 16 at the time. Barker was put on probation to age 19 and ordered to complete a juvenile residential program."


  • Eddie Lee Davis, 20, 938 Eighth Ave. N.E.
"Davis was charged with felony receiving stolen property last September. He was accepted into a court diversion program in May."

Also charged were
  • Marcus Orlando Smith, 25, Chicago
  • Jerry Timothy Brown, 21, 1104 E. Center St., No. 5

It would be a help to voters if the judges who sentenced these guys to nothing for their crimes were identified by the paper.

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Kids now unsafe at Silver Lake Park

Teen robbed by man on a bicycle

A 14-year-old Rochester boy was robbed of $26 while riding his bicycle Saturday evening in the 800 block of East Silver Lake Drive ...that is, he was riding his bike in one of our busiest city parks. A man on another bike had his hand in his pocket, as if he had a gun, and told the boy to give him his money.

At the meeting last week, Chief of Police Roger Peterson said he expected 'some form' of response to put boots on the ground in these areas, on foot or bicycle.

Where are they?
How long must we wait for a response?
What did the 'man' look like? How would anyone else know what 'man' to keep an eye out for? Why wasn't this in the paper as well?

Hoodlums cut window screens, enter homes while you sleep

Five boys suspected in Rochester crime spree

Five young men, ages 11 to 17, have been arrested for "an overnight crime spree that included breaking into at least two homes, stealing two vehicles and prowling through dozens of cars. "

Their robberies were stopped by a local resident who saw the boys cutting a screen on a vacant house in the 3000 block of Harbor Drive Southeast off Marion Road. Officers discovered the vehicle itself had been reported stolen about 3 a.m. that day from the Century Hills area. They had also stolen a Jeep.

"Officers were told by the teens that they had been at the Country Club Manor home twice the previous evening, Muyres said. When they cut the screen, the people were still up, so the group left and returned later, when the occupants were asleep."

Answer?
Rigorous enforcement of a curfew, for one.
Police should be stopping cars with young men tooling around neighborhoods they don't live in.
Call the cops on groups of young men hanging around neighborhoods.
Be vigilant. Look outside.
Lock your doors and windows.
Buy a shotgun.

Friday, September 12, 2008

No right to self defense in Olmsted County?

Mark Ostrem, Olmsted County Attorney was at the meeting last night (discussing the recent spate of shootings in our neighborhoods), and he said something quite disturbing.

In response to a question about self-defense using firearms, he was very direct. He told the 250 or so people in attendance that this was unwise because he -as County Attorney- would make the decision whether you had made the right decision in using a weapon in defending yourself. And -I'm paraphrasing- he said "we have enough work as it is". Better, he said, just to call the police.

He thus implied that Olmsted County could very likely prosecute you for defending yourself. And apparently it'll be up to Mark Ostrem to decide if you were right to do so. I suppose if it's a slow month, they'll go ahead and charge you. Or not. The point is, the rule is so vague, it's best not to do anything in self defense. Get shot, get knifed, get robbed, get raped, get beat up. Then call the cops.

Just don't fight back. Or else you'll go to jail too.
Maybe I misunderstood, but I doubt it.

As a result, Olmsted County feels that should my family get assaulted while walking on the bike path, I should run away and hope my wife and kid can keep up with me, or be a good witness so I can tell the cops what happened later, or try to convince the attacker to stop through verbal negotiation. But I shouldn't fight to stop the attack. Better to be a victim, or Rochester will put you in prison.

Yet the US Supreme Court recently struck down a handgun ban in Washington, D.C., and (re)stated that the 2nd Amendment actually does guarantee the individual right to keep guns at home for self-defense.

Olmsted County says this: You have the right to bear arms ...as long as you don't actually use them.

Something is seriously wrong here.

In the Heat of the Night

Must have been 250 people at the gym lat night, despite humidity and heat that made it seem like Georgia. They looked worried, earnest, grim. There to ask questions about crime in Rochester, including the recent shootings.

A great turnout by city officials, including the helpful input of our gang and drug policemen, county attorney, and police chief. The Mayor and many City Council folks were there, as well as prospective candidates. It went 90 minutes, the discomfort eased by cookies and water (free!). Mike LaPlante ran it well.

It was a good first step. The citizens of our town are justifiably upset how we seemed to have been invaded by thugs.
What's next?

A group of the Rochester Neighborhood Associations, including ESPNA, Meadow Park, Slatterly Park, and Kutzky Park, will begin to form committees with defined aims and goals; action itmes for the county, city, police, and citizens that can form an effective reponse.

Thursday, September 11, 2008

Check this out

I am going to participate in the PostBulletin's Thursday's live blog:

The Grill with Rochester Police Chief Roger Peterson.
From noon to one p.m.


And remember to come tonight to the neighborhood forum and ask city leaders about the crime problem:
.Thursday, September 11, 7:00 PM at the Boys and Girls Club

Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Is my own neighborhood safe?

Find your own house in the crime wave!
See Crime Maps & Reports for Rochester, MN and Olmsted County

at Rochestercrime.org

Very cool.

Why the increase in crime here?

Why is crime rising in Rochester?
Is it the same reason crime has increased in many American cities?

"The answer implicates one of the most celebrated antipoverty programs of recent decades."

Section 8 housing.

"Studies show that recipients of Section8 vouchers have tended to choose moderately poor neighborhoods that were already on the decline, not low-poverty neighborhoods. One recent study publicized by HUD warned that policy makers should lower their expectations, because voucher recipients seemed not to be spreading out, as they had hoped, but clustering together. Galster theorizes that every neighborhood has its tipping point—a threshold well below a 40 percent poverty rate—beyond which crime explodes and other severe social problems set in. Pushing a greater number of neighborhoods past that tipping point is likely to produce more total crime. In 2003, the Brookings Institution published a list of the 15 cities where the number of high-poverty neighborhoods had declined the most. In recent years, most of those cities have also shown up as among the most violent in the U.S., according to FBI data."
From Olmsted County Section 8 Voucher Program:
Section 8 is a tenant based rental assistance program funded by the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) and administered by the OCHRA throughout Olmsted County. The Section 8 program is available in most areas of the nation. The assistance "follows" the participant rather than the participant having to live in a particular unit to receive the assistance. This means it's possible for the participant to move without losing the assistance.
No mention is made about oversight regarding crime or any other condition put on the recipients for getting this assistance.

38. Rochester HOUSING CODE: REGISTRATION OF RENTAL UNITS

SEMCIL
Community Accessible Housing List for theRochester Area
Section 8 subsidized housing.
The Hylands, Innsbruck, Northgate Plaza, Central Towers, Oakridge, Newbridge,
Eastridge Estates, East Side Village, Rochester Square Apartments

Income Based Housing.
Brandywine Apartments, Civic Square Apartments, Bear Creek Apartments, Essex Place, Bandel Hills Townhomes


Tuesday, September 9, 2008

The PB sez: Action on Rochester housing for released prisoners is tabled
'The Olmsted County Housing and Redevelopment Authority voted Monday to table a request that it withdraw applications for two conditional use permits and a variance for houses at 1119 Seventh Ave. S.W., and 1813 First Ave. S.W.

Since the demolition of Maxwell House and changes at Civic Inn barring released prisoners, the county has struggled to find places to put the homeless portion of the roughly 300 prisoners per year released here.

"How do you think it is appropriate to have sex offenders 500 feet from a Toys 'R Us?" said Dr. Ferris Tamimi, who lives near the 1119 house. "It just doesn't seem logical." Some senior citizens said they are afraid for their
own safety, too. '

The question: What do we do with released prisoners?

I think a better question is to ask:
Why are we releasing people who are a continuing threat to our city?
Is it appropriate to have sex offenders 500 feet from anyone at all?
Their release promotes fear for a good reason: many of these ex-prisoners re-offend. Repeatedly. Sex crimes and drug crimes and robberies redux.

The salient question is: How long should these guys stay in prison?
Because clearly it is not long enough now.

The connection between disorder, fear, and economics.




St. Louis has observed a decades-long downward trend in population. It grew in numbers until hitting a peak of 822,000 in 1930, and has fallen ever since.


In 2000 its population was down 12% from 1990, to 348,000 people. Not surprisingly, the city has experienced falling tax revenues and diminished clout.


Where did they all go?

Well, they moved out or -equally important- they never moved in.


In cities like St. Louis, where population migrates out and has little new growth, the problems of the city become separated from the resources in the suburbs.


"Transitional problems associated with persistent and severe outmigration also arise: accumulation of disadvantaged citizens, declining demand for city housing, and a diminished replacement capacity in the population."


The pattern is clear: Neighborhoods lose people and then loses revenue. Rent and housing values decline. Vacancies increase. The blight begins to spread. The city cuts back on services even further in a spiral that grows larger and ever larger. The city as a whole becomes even weaker and less desirable.



Some books like Mapping Decline: St. Louis and the Fate of the American City by Colin Gordon focus on racism as the cause. I disagree.

The cause is disorder, and the crime that attends it.


We in Rochester have had in 2008 numerous episodes of gunfire, an experience new to Mayberry. Catching the actual offender does very little to assuage the fear this pattern of violence has caused. Suggesting the fear is exagerrated misses the point.


The prospect of confrontation with a violent or drunk or rowdy or drug-dealing person, whatever his race, induces fear. This is especially true among the defenseless, including the elderly. Their only available responses when the police do not respond to the disorder (and instead focus on the crime alone):


  • stay inside, doors locked

  • move away

Few resort to violence themselves.


Visitors soon hear of the shootings and become unwilling to visit or move here. The decline begins. It has begun in Rochester. It threatens Mayo Clinic and IBM and the Civic Center. Will Jehovah's Witnesses still rent a hall when they don't feel safe? Youth sports tournaments won't come to a town they are afraid to be in. Patients can visit Johns Hopkins and see a bad neighborhood and good doctors. So why travel here?



What will the city leaders do?




Monday, September 8, 2008

Broken windows and Shots fired



Gunshots. Sirens. Arrests. Drive-by shootings. Gangs.

Sounds like Minneapolis, Chicago, or Detroit.
But it's not. It's our own Mayberry, MN.

In the last few weeks there has been many incidents. The headlines are simple.





3 suspects in drive-by shooting appear in court
Five arrested in shooting; neighbors still worried

Is Rochester no longer a safe city?
What can we do?

We are witnessing in real time the Problem of Broken Windows.
In their 1989 article, James Q. Wilson and George L. Kelling tell us:
"The conventional police strategy is "incident-oriented"--a citizen calls to report an incident, such as a burglary, and the police respond by recording information relevant to the crime and then trying to solve it. ...But if responding to incidents is all that the police do, the community problems that cause or explain many of these incidents will never be addressed, and so the incidents will continue and their number will perhaps increase."

But the source is not poverty, but social structure and character:

"If the first broken window in a building is not repaired, then people who like breaking windows will assume that no one cares about the building and more windows will be broken. Soon the building will have no windows. Likewise, when disorderly behavior--say, rude remarks by loitering youths--is left unchallenged, the signal given is that no one cares. The disorder escalates, possibly to serious crime."

In another article they describe how this cycle of increasing disorder results in the decay and decline of communities:

"But we tend to overlook or forget another source of fear: the fear of being bothered by disorderly people - not violent people or necessarily criminals, but disreputable or obstreperous or unpredictable people: panhandlers, drunks, addicts, rowdy teenagers, prostitutes, loiterers, the mentally disturbed."

In short, the job of the police is not merely to solve crimes, but is first and foremost to maintain order. Disorder is linked with crime, so goes the broken windows theory.

At present Rochester MN has a serious problem with disorder.
What does the City Council say? What about Mayor Brede?
Come to the neighborhood forum and ask them.

Thursday, September 11, 7:00 PM at the Boys and Girls Club